For now, I'd Like To Introduce What I call the three "C" s as a Means of partial Effectively dealing with the issue of suitability relationship, no matter how you meet. I call it relationship shorthand and while It Is not bullet proof, it's a great way of looking at relationships. Both the structure and the application are simple. One of my friends I Thought Discussed it with simplicity WAS ITS Why It worked so well. The three "C" s stand for Content, Context and Comfort. The first cam Two components from my business and Organizational Development education. The Third component Grew out of observation year I made about personal relationships.
Content, as Defined by the dictionary IS, "that Which is Contained by something, as in the contents of a drawer." Both our lives have as a couple and Individuals Have happy. It Will Come as a surprise to no one That Often the content IS changing. Life Happens and it affects the content of our lives, and with Whom you are Likely to Be compatible. That's Why Life Will work Interests and matter.
Context Is the second component. Few Things exist outside of a context, to include our lives. When we enter a relationship in Into Any form, how your context and "historical" context did together Will Be pivotally important. If your life is out of context's sync with his, the ride IS Likely To Be bumpy. A mismatch in terms of your life's contextual realities and your partner's Usually shows up in the unwelcome form of stress Which ultimately affects your relationship in Ways You'd prefer it did not. There Is not Much you can do about contextual realities in the short run, Being so sensitive to them up front IS a prudent measure for Both Potential partners.
Our last component IS comfort. Comfort Is How It Feels to Be Together. When Everything is in your Clicking relationship, the content of your lives together and you share the contextual realities combine to create comfort Often organically. Conversely, comfort to Some Extent Can Compensate for Difficulties in life Either happy or contextual conflict, if Both parts make year effort to "plus-up" the comfort factor for Each Other. Will it work only for Period of time if one but not the Other IS making this effort.
This is Probably the time for me to mention my Belief That no relationship if endure Will Any of These IS elements conspicuously unfavorable for a Prolonged Period. This shows up in Especially Earlier stages. We Will Never Be free of Periods in the lives we lead at least When One of These components get out of whack Will Perhaps Even More Than One. When That OCCURS, we make a decision to move on to work or Through It, DEPENDING ON how our Invested we are in year partner and enduring relationship with him or her. Purpose if it Persists Indefinitely, Will Often a relationship break from under the strain, however well-intentioned we are.
What the three "C" s do best is organizes our thinking about our relationship, whether it Is in early stages or at STI STI more mature and advanced courses. As We've Discussed Earlier in this article, thesis components are Interdependent and work together to create environment in Which year we want to stay, or conversely, create one in which (Hopefully) both sides Recognize Need for a change. That changed May take the form of Another relationship with gold Someone better suited May it mean to work together year agreement to Improve the effects of one or more of the components on the relationship.
The three "C" s clear the fog and make decisions more discussion and Focused. THEY serve as a framework for discussion of exchange You Can make or cooperatively as a non-confrontational way of discussing What May Be fatally flawed in a relationship, and moving on with less angst and hard feeling. There's nothing magical about 'em. As With Any thoughtful framework, it covered any Both sides are working together to Committed and It Will not Work If They Are not. Even purpose annually Used by Individual, Can it serve as a great barometer for Both the relationship as you're reading Potential profiles and have a gut check as the relationship evolve.
Tags: marius panzarella david deangelo seminars neil strauss tips john alexander john alexander pua j d fuentes conversations with richard bandler napoleon hill books
0 comments:
Post a Comment