Virtual Book Tour Getting Old Is A Full Time Job

Virtual Book Tour Getting Old Is A Full Time Job
We are so pleased to be hosting Dr. Susan Lieberman today to talk about her new book, Getting Old is a Full Time Job: Moving on From a Life of Working Hard. Susan writes about her insight into the 12 "jobs" of retirement - ranging from Strategist to Script Writer to Soul Catcher. Susan has a gift for using the challenging issues in her own life as a starting point for her highly accessible books. We enjoyed visiting with her here several years ago as she talked about The Mother-in-Law's Manual and her learning curve as a MIL.

Susan, after your last book on mothers-in-law, how did your new one come into being?

I started the Houston chapter of a national group called The Transition Network. It's for professional women 50 and over moving from their mainstream work to 'What's Next?'

We meet once a month and focus on our lives and our many different kinds of transitions. I love the women I have met through TTN. They are smart, reflective and candid, and as I listened to them, I heard a recurring theme. We kept judging ourselves, often negatively, against the criteria we used when we were building our professional lives. For example, I would be sitting in the kitchen happily sipping tea and reading the New York Times, something that makes me happy, when I would ruin it by castigating myself for still being in my robe at 9:30. It hit me that when we retire, rewire, shift down or switch our focus, we needed to develop a new template for success. That was the beginning point for the book.

It seems that instead of going to therapy, when I need to work out my own issues, I sit down at the computer, and I needed to figure out what retirement meant for me.

Are you really retired? You have started a new business and written two books since you left a full time teaching job. Do you consider that retired?

I love this question. People often want to help me understand how busy and engaged I am and not at all a "retired person," as if that were a minor illness. Yes, I AM retired. Here is what that means to me: I have not stopped being productive or engaged in the world. I am just not driven by external demands, by how others want me to spend my time on or by what others think it is important to achieve. My life now is much more determined by internal interests and desires. I am the CEO, COO, HR Director, shareholder, vending machine operator and janitor of this company called MY LIFE. I get to do my own performance appraisals, and now, finally, I can spend my time as I wish. I don't work 50 or 60 hours a week any more, and I avoid work that makes me unhappy.

In Getting Old Is A Full Time Job, you talk about 12 jobs waiting for us in retirement. Which of these most captures your attention?

Hands down, the hardest job for me is Purveyor of Pleasure. I was really good at working. I had a 50-year history of successful work. I was not so good at playing, at figuring out what that meant for me, besides working well. After I left my full-time job, I was determined to "have fun." The problem was I couldn't figure out what was, for me, fun. I don't much like sports, I don't sew or garden. I am a good cook but I didn't really want to be a better cook. I couldn't work it out until someone suggested I substitute the word "pleasure" for "fun." Then I got it.

Writing books for me is deep pleasure. I won't describe it as FUN. It's hard work, It can get intense and frustrating. But it gives me so much pleasure to do the interviews, work out what I think is important to say and play with saying it in ways that other people find accessible and useful.

It doesn't give me much pleasure to do the marketing. Using my mainstream template for success, which included economic gain and recognition of accomplishments, of course I should be spending lots of time marketing. Using the success template for this stage of my life, I should just be writing another book and enjoy it, even if I don't get rich or famous. So please, buy a book because I am not working on many ways to get people to do that.

The other job that captures my attention is Director of Physical Planning. I just told you I am not much for physical exercise so getting myself to the gym and walking several mile a couple times a week takes discipline. It isn't, for me, fun or even pleasurable, but feeling good, being able to wrestle with my grandkids, being able to do what I want IS fun, so I know I have to make myself stay in shape and not allow myself to be diverted. Not having to do it at 6:30 A.M. also makes the job easier.

You don't sound so very old. How did you pick this title?

I am 69. I started working on the book when I was 67. I didn't feel OLD then nor do I now...but I am not young. I am not really middle aged any more. What has happened to my generation is that 18 additional years have been inserted in to the average life span. So people at 90 and people at 70 all fall into the same post-middle aged category and we are, of course, not the same.

But getting old is not a curse. It's what happens. If I am not getting older, I am getting deader. Sixty is not the new forty. What it is, rather, is the new sixty. My sixty is not the same as my grandmother's sixty but my son is forty, and he and I are not in the same place.

So often, when someone finds out I am sixty-nine, they say, "Oh my, you don't look sixty nine," as if it would be a bad thing if I did. First, I look about average. Half the people I know my age look better and half probably don't look as good - and that's been true since I was 19. Second, what should 69 look like? And third, what if I did look 69? Would I need immediate plastic surgery? Of course, most women - men, too - like feeling attractive. I like it too - but how I feel and how I think, how flexible I am in body and sprit, how much more able I am now to forgive, overlook and understand is what's important, not how many wrinkles in my neck.

My friend, Irene, told me I couldn't use the word OLD in a book title because no one wants to talk about feeling, getting or being old. But really, that's what was on my mind, that is what interested me...how I do this aging bit in a way that makes sense for me since I am, without regard to my wishes, going to be doing it-if I'm fortunate.

Who is the audience for Getting Old is a Full Time Job?

I think this book is for people about 55-75, those who are retired or thinking about some sort of retirement. Dick Goldberg, a tough critic who is national director of Coming of Age, told me this was a good book for men because it talks about jobs, and men like jobs. I very much wanted to write a book that appealed to both men and women so that made me happy. But just this week I got two compliments that made me even happier.

One came from my good friend Sue in St. Louis and who called to ask me for 15 books. Why on earth, I asked, do you need 15 books? "Well, my mother took my copy, loved it and now wants to give it to all her friends and neighbors." And, Sue added, "You should feel good because my mother doesn't like anything!" The other pleasing comment came from a woman in my breakfast club who told me she had given a copy to her housekeeper for Christmas, and her housekeeper loved the book as well.

To write a book that appeals to a 55 year-old petroleum engineer, a 64 year old housekeeper, an 82 year old crotchety grandmother and my wonderful sister-in-law who is still working flat out as an architect makes me button-bursting proud. And it reinforces my notion that because 21st Century aging and retirement is quite different than what has come before, we don't have enough models, enough visible ways of thinking through this stage that Mary Catherine Bateson calls Second Adulthood and we all need to be talking together about how to do retirement as well as we did other stages in our lives - or better.

Thanks for joining us today, Susan and filling us in on your latest pleasure in retirement, Getting Old is a Full Time Job. Readers, if you want to ask Susan questions about how to get started on your own 12 jobs, just click on "Comments" below and follow the prompts. Susan would love to hear from you - and so would we!

Reference: pualib.blogspot.com

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Whos The Most Confident Man In The Room

Whos The Most Confident Man In The Room
Envision you just walked into a bar.

You direct to get a drink and play a part yourself to the bartender. Behind schedule talking for a bit, he offers you the chance to win free refreshments. He says he wants to play a extract.

He gets to point out three guys. Focus only alertness and a gentle portrayal, you dine to start out who is the maximum forthright man in the room. If you get it right, refreshments on the acreage.

The bartender warns you that the response isn't foul. And in fact, every elderly person who's played tonight has gotten it shoddy.

*


Man A is difficult a custom-tailored Italian conflict and a Rolex. He looks decrease. He's delimited by his attendants and elderly partygoers look at him. Everything about him says enchanting.

The bartender explains, "That guy is an executive of a holding company. He's spend millions, on the board of merged non-profit organizations, and hosts some of the maximum alluring endeavors."

*


Man B is chatting up two beautiful women. He's overenthusiastic, affable, and demonstrating -- the women love it. He's physical and merrily dances with them. They're giggling and can't stop cheerful.

"That guy is social with every attractive woman. He's a real talkative. He's interminably droll and seems to narrate angry what to say. I've seen him energy home extra girls than everybody to boot."

*


Man C is sophistication against the wall, off to the side. He's in a top and khakis. He sips his drink and heedlessly glances vis-?-vis the room. He isn't talking to everybody and no one is talking to him.

"That guy is a software organize. He's dispel and as a rule keeps to himself. I've only occasionally seen him talk to people."

The bartender looks at you and asks, "So who's the maximum forthright man in the room? Is it Mr. Prestige, Mr. Expressive, or The Loner?"

If you chose Man A or Man B, you're shoddy. Above-board if you chose Man C, you're shoddy. The only right response is...

ANY ONE OF THEM.

Right because MAN A is successful, doesn't involuntarily mean he's forthright.

Like if he bases his inclusive self-worth on his depth and status? Like if he exhausted his life trying to prove that he's good satisfactory directly his accomplishments? All of that may possibly be engaged sideways in an clever if his company went under.

Almost certainly he dresses glitzy to repeatedly verify his obey because he feels quaking without that support. Almost certainly he feels people and women will only like him based on what he can drag out.

Mystery that's built on material possessions isn't very forthright at all.

How about MAN B? He has to be forthright, right? He's awesome with the ladies and a real charmer. That's great...if that's who he beyond doubt is.

But what if it's all a performance? Like if he puts on a obscure pretending to be this overemotional, chivalrous extrovert? In the same way as in reality he's an quaking wreck who memorizes lines and routines to pretend durable conversation.

Almost certainly he does all this because he feels like a little guy if he doesn't "win" every woman over. He chases that support night whilst night but is despondent to the same extent no one knows the real him. He bases his spend on extinct sex that never very fulfills him.

Well-behaved far-fetched? I used to be that guy. I was getting laid but couldn't be any extra and no-one else.

But dependable there's no way MAN C may possibly ever be the maximum forthright. He's a loner and doesn't privileged to network with others. He's conceivably afraid of talking to new people or getting rejected.

Individuals are a lot of assumptions. Like if he's not beyond doubt anti-social?

Almost certainly he got out of a long relationship and isn't available to date right now. Almost certainly he comes to the bar to show off his first choice prepare. Almost certainly he has a girlfriend and starkly likes to arrange whilst a long day of work, focus to the music, and people watch.

He doesn't "need" to talk to people in that point in time because he's pleased. He's open to conversation but is happy perched out and placatory. He's having a great time without having to impress elderly people.

That seems rash to me.

-

The point is that any of these guys may possibly be forthright or not.

The decisive factors are not about what they look like, where on earth they work, who they narrate, or pure very usefully the posture they verify.

It's about how they perceive their own spend and their intentions put off those behaviors.

It follows that, the extra recipe questions are...

Who's presentation their true selves? VS Who's acting?

Who loves himself for himself? VS Who bases his obey on strange sources like back up, women, or outer judgment?

Who's appear in what "they" want? VS Who's appear in what they think "elderly people" want?

Austerely the in a weak position man who is overtly himself possesses true specter.

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS